Ad
related to: sum of the series geometric method exampleskutasoftware.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
More generally one can define summation methods slightly stronger than Borel's by taking the numbers b n to be slightly larger, for example b n = cnlog n or b n =cnlog n log log n. In practice this generalization is of little use, as there are almost no natural examples of series summable by this method that cannot also be summed by Borel's method.
The geometric series is an infinite series derived from a special type of sequence called a geometric progression.This means that it is the sum of infinitely many terms of geometric progression: starting from the initial term , and the next one being the initial term multiplied by a constant number known as the common ratio .
An infinite series of any rational function of can be reduced to a finite series of polygamma functions, by use of partial fraction decomposition, [8] as explained here. This fact can also be applied to finite series of rational functions, allowing the result to be computed in constant time even when the series contains a large number of terms.
Examples of a geometric sequence are powers r k of a fixed non-zero number r, such as 2 k and 3 k. The general form of a geometric sequence is , , , , , … where r is the common ratio and a is the initial value. The sum of a geometric progression's terms is called a geometric series.
A generalized definition of the "sum" of a divergent series is called a summation method or summability method. There are many different methods and it is desirable that they share some properties of ordinary summation .
It is useful to figure out which summation methods produce the geometric series formula for which common ratios. One application for this information is the so-called Borel-Okada principle: If a regular summation method assigns = to / for all in a subset of the complex plane, given certain restrictions on , then the method also gives the analytic continuation of any other function () = = on ...
Adding or subtracting two series term-by-term, Multiplying through by a scalar term-by-term, "Shifting" the series with no change in the sum, and; Increasing the sum by adding a new term to the series' head. These are all legal manipulations for sums of convergent series, but 1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + ⋯ is not a convergent series.
A summation method that is linear and stable cannot sum the series 1 + 2 + 3 + ⋯ to any finite value. (Stable means that adding a term at the beginning of the series increases the sum by the value of the added term.) This can be seen as follows. If + + + =, then adding 0 to both sides gives
Ad
related to: sum of the series geometric method exampleskutasoftware.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month