Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
AMG Capital Management, LLC v. Federal Trade Commission, 593 U.S. ___ (2021), was a U.S. Supreme Court case dealing with the ability of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to seek monetary relief for restitution or disgorgement from those that it found in violation of trade practices.
The money comes from a $1.3 billion civil court judgment the FTC obtained against Tucker and his AMG Services Inc. [20] However, on petition to the United States Supreme Court in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. FTC, the Court ruled unanimously in April 2021 that the FTC did not have the authority under Congress to seek equitable relief and ...
In AMG Capital Management, LLC v. FTC (2021), the Supreme Court held that statutory authority for the Federal Trade Commission to sue for an “injunction” does not authorize suit for restitution. The court unanimously held that the statutory language refers to prospective equitable relief, and does not include retrospective monetary relief.
The Federal Trade Commission put the brakes on a massive tax relief scam it says cheated struggling consumers nationwide out of more than $60 million while its owners lived lavishly and collected ...
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission on Wednesday finalized a ban on companies knowingly buying or selling fake online reviews, giving the agency the power to levy fines against the shadowy practice.
The Federal Trade Commission issued the rule in August banning the sale or purchase of online reviews. The rule, which went into effect Monday, allows the agency to seek civil penalties against ...
AMG Capital Management, LLC v. FTC; ASARCO Inc. v. Idaho Tax Comm'n; AT&T Corp. v. Hulteen; ... Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division; Thompson v ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us