Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
TableDelete AFTER DELETE ON Database. OriginalTable REFERENCING OLD AS O FOR EACH ROW MODE DB2SQL BEGIN DECLARE Now TIMESTAMP; SET NOW = CURRENT TIMESTAMP; UPDATE Database. HistoryTable SET EndDate = Now WHERE Column1 = O. Column1 AND EndDate IS NULL; END;-- Trigger for UPDATE CREATE TRIGGER Database. TableUpdate AFTER UPDATE ON Database.
MS SQL Server supports trigger for DML and DDL statement plus special trigger "logon". The scope of DDL triggers can be a database (CREATE TRIGGER name ON DATABASE ...) or the entire SQL Server instance (CREATE TRIGGER name ON ALL SERVER). When you use the entire instance, you can capture all events executed on commands that have server-level scop
By contrast, a temporal database qualifies each row with a valid time stamp, valid time period or valid time interval. For example, we can assert the fact that "John Smith" was a member of staff during the period 1 June 2001 and now. As of 2006, current databases were the most common type of database in use.
A cursor holds the rows (one or more) returned by a SQL statement. The set of rows the cursor holds is referred to as the active set. [12] A cursor can be explicit or implicit. In a FOR loop, an explicit cursor shall be used if the query will be reused, otherwise an implicit cursor is preferred.
To restate; every object (P) has a Timestamp (TS), however if transaction T i wants to Write to an object, and the transaction has a Timestamp (TS) that is earlier than the object's current Read Timestamp, TS(T i) < RTS(P), then the transaction is aborted and restarted. (This is because a later transaction already depends on the old value.)
In this case, if the transaction's timestamp is after the object's read timestamp, the read timestamp is set to the transaction's timestamp. If a transaction wants to write to an object, but the transaction started before the object's read timestamp it means that something has had a look at the object, and we assume it took a copy of the object ...
The "Faculty and Their Courses" relation described in the previous example suffers from this type of anomaly, for if a faculty member temporarily ceases to be assigned to any courses, the last of the records on which that faculty member appears must be deleted, effectively also deleting the faculty member, unless the Course Code field is set to ...
The conflict is materialized if the requested conflicting operation is actually executed: in many cases a requested/issued conflicting operation by a transaction is delayed and even never executed, typically by a lock on the operation's object, held by another transaction, or when writing to a transaction's temporary private workspace and ...