Ads
related to: pumping lemma for grammar practice questionsteacherspayteachers.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
- Projects
Get instructions for fun, hands-on
activities that apply PK-12 topics.
- Lessons
Powerpoints, pdfs, and more to
support your classroom instruction.
- Packets
Perfect for independent work!
Browse our fun activity packs.
- Worksheets
All the printables you need for
math, ELA, science, and much more.
- Projects
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In the theory of formal languages, the pumping lemma for regular languages is a lemma that describes an essential property of all regular languages. Informally, it says that all sufficiently long strings in a regular language may be pumped —that is, have a middle section of the string repeated an arbitrary number of times—to produce a new ...
In computer science, in particular in formal language theory, the pumping lemma for context-free languages, also known as the Bar-Hillel lemma, [1] is a lemma that gives a property shared by all context-free languages and generalizes the pumping lemma for regular languages. The pumping lemma can be used to construct a refutation by ...
In a context-free grammar, we can pair up characters the way we do with brackets. The simplest example: S → aSb S → ab. This grammar generates the language {:}, which is not regular (according to the pumping lemma for regular languages). The special character ε stands for the empty string.
Pumping lemma for context-free languages, the fact that all sufficiently long strings in such a language have a pair of substrings that can be repeated arbitrarily many times, usually used to prove that certain languages are not context-free; Pumping lemma for indexed languages; Pumping lemma for regular tree languages
To convert a grammar to Chomsky normal form, a sequence of simple transformations is applied in a certain order; this is described in most textbooks on automata theory. [4]: 87–94 [5] [6] [7] The presentation here follows Hopcroft, Ullman (1979), but is adapted to use the transformation names from Lange, Leiß (2009).
The pumping lemma can't be used to prove that a given Language L is regular, since it provides a necessary, but not sufficient condition for regularity; cf. the "⇒" after "regular(L)" in the formal expression, and section Pumping_lemma_for_regular_languages#Converse_of_lemma_not_true. - Jochen Burghardt 08:47, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
The proof is essentially the same as the standard pumping lemma: use the pigeonhole principle to find copies of some nonterminal symbol in the longest path in the shortest derivation tree. Now we prove the first part of Parikh's theorem, making use of the above lemma.
The language () = {} defined above is not a context-free language, and this can be strictly proven using the pumping lemma for context-free languages, but for example the language {} (at least 1 followed by the same number of 's) is context-free, as it can be defined by the grammar with = {}, = {,}, the start symbol, and the following ...
Ads
related to: pumping lemma for grammar practice questionsteacherspayteachers.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month