Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Petitions backed by 100,000 signatures would now be considered for debate in Parliament and the website was moved to Directgov. [6] In the following year, a total of 36,000 petitions were submitted, attracting 6.4 million signatures. [7] After the closure of the Directgov website, the e-petitions were moved to the new GOV.UK website in October ...
The process for e-petitions differs from the process for paper petitions, which can only be presented to the House of Commons by an MP. [1]E-petitions can be submitted by British citizens and UK residents to the UK Government and Parliament via the UK Parliament petitions website.
The UK Parliament petitions website has operated in various guises since 2006. [15] Beginning in 2011, a parliamentary committee considered holding a parliamentary debate for petitions attracting more than 100,000 signatures. [16] In 2015, the process was formalized within Parliament and a permanent Petitions Committee was established. [17]
The government must respond to all petitions with over 10,000 signatures, and petitions reaching 100,000 signatures are considered before parliament. The petition comes amid growing backlash over ...
It is also considered to be the most-signed petition to the UK parliament of any type on record, surpassing a petition from 1990 that protested reductions to the ambulance service, which was signed by 4.5 million people. [2] On 24 March the petition surpassed 5 million signatures. [15] On 31 March it reached 6 million signatures. [16]
The emergence of petitioning during the reign of Edward I of England (1272-1307) contributed to beginnings of legislative power for the Parliament of England. [8] Petitions became a common form of protest and request to the British House of Commons in the 18th and 19th centuries; one million petitions were submitted to the UK's parliament ...
The election court tries the petition without a jury, [8] and has all the powers of the High Court or Court of Session. [2] Witnesses give evidence on oath, and a witness is not excused from answering a question even if the answer would incriminate him, although the answer cannot be used against him in any subsequent criminal proceedings (except in the case of a charge of perjury). [9]
The UK government gave a commitment in the 2010 Coalition Agreement to bring into force a power of recall. [6] Following the election and the coalition government's commitment, Zac Goldsmith introduced a series of private members bills for a recall process, none of which were successful. [5]