enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Rucho v. Common Cause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rucho_v._Common_Cause

    Rucho v. Common Cause, No. 18-422, 588 U.S. 684 (2019) is a landmark case of the United States Supreme Court concerning partisan gerrymandering. [1] The Court ruled that while partisan gerrymandering may be "incompatible with democratic principles", the federal courts cannot review such allegations, as they present nonjusticiable political questions outside the jurisdiction of these courts.

  3. List of federal judges appointed by Donald Trump - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_federal_judges...

    As of March 1, 2025, the United States Senate has confirmed 234 Article III judges nominated by Trump: three associate justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, 54 judges for the United States courts of appeals, 174 judges for the United States district courts, and three judges for the United States Court of International Trade. There ...

  4. List of justices of the Indiana Supreme Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Justices_of_the...

    From 1816 until 1851 justices served seven-year terms and were appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Indiana Senate. [2] From 1851 until 1971 justices were elected by popular vote every six years. From 1971 to the present a pool of candidates is selected by the Indiana Judicial Nominating Commission and one is appointed by the governor ...

  5. Indiana Supreme Court justices on track to win their ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/indiana-supreme-court-justices-track...

    Hoosiers voted overwhelmingly to allow the three Indiana Supreme Court justices up for retention to keep their seats for an additional 10-year term.

  6. Gill v. Whitford - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gill_v._Whitford

    Gill v. Whitford, 585 U.S. 48 (2018), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the constitutionality of partisan gerrymandering.Other forms of gerrymandering based on racial or ethnic grounds had been deemed unconstitutional, and while the Supreme Court had identified that extreme partisan gerrymandering could also be unconstitutional, the Court had not agreed on how this could be ...

  7. US Supreme Court may make it harder to prove racial ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/us-supreme-court-may-harder...

    The U.S. Supreme Court may be on the verge of making it even harder to win legal challenges accusing state officials of racial gerrymandering - the illegal manipulation of an electoral district's ...

  8. Efficiency gap - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efficiency_gap

    The efficiency gap was first devised by University of Chicago law professor Nicholas Stephanopoulos and political scientist Eric McGhee in 2014. [3] The metric has notably been used to quantitatively assess the effect of gerrymandering, the assigning of voters to electoral districts in such a way as to increase the number of districts won by one political party at the expense of another.

  9. Supreme Court seems skeptical of Trump's claim of absolute ...

    www.aol.com/news/no-one-above-law-supreme...

    The Supreme Court on Thursday appeared likely to reject former President Donald Trump’s claim of absolute immunity from prosecution over election interference, but several justices signaled ...