Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Sean "Diddy" Combs is challenging a recent ruling in a sexual assault lawsuit against him.. On Thursday, Sept. 12, Combs, 54, filed an emergency motion to vacate a default judgment, and a motion ...
Sean "Diddy" Combs isn't handing over millions to a litigious Michigan inmate just yet. His team files a motion to vacate the judgment in the sexual-assault case.
Gov. Gretchen Whitmer sued Thursday to protect abortion rights, asking a Michigan court to recognize a right to abortion under the state constitution and to overturn a 176-year-old ban in the ...
In 1833, all the county courts in all counties in the territory of Michigan except Wayne were abolished and replaced by one circuit court of the territory of Michigan. [2] In 1836, the state was divided into 3 circuits. The 1850 Michigan Constitution made the office of circuit court judges elected officials and set the term of office to six (6 ...
The Michigan Supreme Court has designated the Berrien County Courts as a consolidation site for the merger of the District Court, Probate Court and Circuit Court into a single Trial Court. [ 13 ] The 6th District Court, which consisted of the cities of Benton Harbor and St. Joseph was merged into the 5th District Court in the 1970s to form a ...
Welch was nominated as a candidate for the Michigan Supreme Court by the Michigan Democratic Party. [4] Welch ran for the seat being vacated by Justice Stephen Markman whose term was expiring. [5] On November 3, 2020, Welch went on to win the general election, giving the Michigan Supreme Court a Democratic majority. [6] [7]
A debate among candidates for Michigan's open U.S. Senate seat scheduled to take place next week has been canceled with the presumed frontrunners declining to take part.
On May 31, 2022, the Supreme Court vacated the Fifth Circuit decision by a 5–4 vote, allowing the injunction to take effect once more. Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Neil Gorsuch dissented, writing that H.B. 20 was "novel" and that it was not clear how precedent should apply, so therefore the Supreme Court should not intervene.