Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments Wednesday in a major case over transgender health care for minors. The case focuses on Tennessee's ban on the treatment for minors in the state. The ...
The federal district court judge who first heard the case found the doctors the state relied on to argue the treatments are too risky were “minimally persuasive based on the current record.”
Trump's team asked the Supreme Court to reject the expedited timeline and allow the appeals court to consider the case first. [29] [30] On December 22, the Supreme Court denied the special counsel's request, leaving the case to the appeals court. [31] On January 9, 2024, the D.C. Court of Appeals heard arguments in the immunity dispute.
Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (also known as 'Anshun') is a decision of the High Court of Australia. The case is notable for originating the 'Anshun estoppel' doctrine in Australian civil proceedings. The rule estops parties from making novel legal claims, when those claims should have been pursued in an earlier legal proceeding. [1]
Throughout decades of cases, the high court has described Black Americans and other racial minorities as a “suspect class,” needing the greatest constitutional protection, and it has deemed ...
The petition went through review at more than a dozen conferences for the Court, which is unusual for most cases. The Court granted the petition for a writ of certiorari on May 17, 2021, limiting the Court's review to a single question, "Whether all pre-viability prohibitions on elective abortions are unconstitutional."
An “unusual” dispute between a former couple has led to a High Court judge having to make a ruling on whether two children exist. The purported father, known as AA for legal reasons, brought ...
NZYQ v Minister for Immigration Court High Court of Australia Full case name NZYQ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs Decided 28 November 2023 Citation HCA 37 Court membership Judges sitting Gageler CJ, Gordon, Edelman, Steward, Gleeson, Jagot, Beech-Jones JJ Case opinions Detention of non-citizens is not for a non-punitive purpose if there is no real prospect of ...