Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Anecdotal evidence (or anecdata [1]) is evidence based on descriptions and reports of individual, personal experiences, or observations, [2] [3] collected in a non-systematic manner. [ 4 ] The term anecdotal encompasses a variety of forms of evidence.
Since the anecdote here cited is admittedly fictional, it cannot be used as evidence. Since it cannot be used as evidence, there is no evidence and all that is left is just an assertion, thus proof by assertion. This can also be applied to anecdotal evidence with no attributable source, such as urban legends, myths, folk sayings and folklore.
The persuasiveness of anecdotal evidence compared to that of statistical evidence has been a subject of debate; some studies have argued for the presence a generalized tendency to overvalue anecdotal evidence, whereas others have emphasized the types of argument as a prerequisite or rejected the conclusion altogether.
Anecdotal evidence is an informal account of evidence in the form of an anecdote. The term is often used in contrast to scientific evidence, as evidence that cannot be investigated using the scientific method. The problem with arguing based on anecdotal evidence is that anecdotal evidence is not necessarily typical; only statistical evidence ...
Whether one has a particular entitlement or right is irrelevant to whether one's assertion is true or false. Where an objection to a belief is made, the assertion of the right to an opinion side-steps the usual steps of discourse of either asserting a justification of that belief, or an argument against the validity of the objection. [4]
An anecdotal generalization is a type of inductive argument in which a conclusion about a population is inferred using a non-statistical sample. [8] In other words, the generalization is based on anecdotal evidence. For example: So far, this year his son's Little League team has won 6 of 10 games.
In the logical argumentation approach, knowledge is seen as form of belief commitment firmly fixed by an argumentation procedure that tests the evidence on both sides, and uses standards of proof to determine whether a proposition qualifies as knowledge. In this evidence-based approach, knowledge must be seen as defeasible.
Anecdotal evidence – Evidence relying on personal testimony; Confabulation – Recall of fabricated, misinterpreted or distorted memories (false memory) Forensic psychology – Using psychological science to help answer legal questions; Legal psychology – Psychological research of the law; Mistaken identity – Legal defense