enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Sotomayor Is Right: The Supreme Court Should Reevaluate ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/sotomayor-supreme-court...

    Pachtman (1976), the precedent in which the Supreme Court announced the doctrine of absolute prosecutorial immunity. A man who had spent years in prison, the Court ruled, could not sue a ...

  3. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    It was the first U.S. Supreme Court ruling to address free speech rights with respect to homosexuality. Manual Enterprises, Inc. v. Day, 370 U.S. 348 (1962) Images of naked men are not, per se, obscene, extending Olesen in a way that spurred an increase in same-sex erotica that helped spur the rise of the LGBTQ rights movement later in the decade.

  4. Stump v. Sparkman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stump_v._Sparkman

    Judicial immunity is the principle in which "a judge [has] complete protection from personal liability for exercising judicial functions". [6] Applying the doctrine of judicial immunity adopted by the U. S. Supreme Court in Bradley v. Fisher [7] in 1871 and held applicable to § 1983 actions in Pierson v.

  5. Trump v. United States (2024) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_v._United_States_(2024)

    Trump's team asked the Supreme Court to reject the expedited timeline and allow the appeals court to consider the case first. [29] [30] On December 22, the Supreme Court denied the special counsel's request, leaving the case to the appeals court. [31] On January 9, 2024, the D.C. Court of Appeals heard arguments in the immunity dispute.

  6. In an attempt to reverse the Supreme Court's immunity ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/attempt-reverse-supreme-courts...

    The Supreme Court’s immunity decision stunned Washington and drew a sharp dissent from the court’s liberal justices warning of the perils to democracy, particularly as Trump seeks a return to ...

  7. Opinion: We should all dissent from the Supreme Court's ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/opinion-dissent-supreme-courts...

    In Clinton vs. Jones, in 1997, the court unanimously ruled that President Clinton had no immunity to protect him from a lawsuit for sexual harassment that occurred when he was governor of Arkansas.

  8. Pearson v. Callahan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearson_v._Callahan

    Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 (2009), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court dealing with the doctrine of qualified immunity. [1]The case centered on the application of mandatory sequencing in determining qualified immunity as set by the 2001 decision, Saucier v.

  9. What to know in the Supreme Court case about immunity for ...

    www.aol.com/news/know-supreme-court-case...

    The Supreme Court has scheduled a special session to hear arguments over whether former President Donald Trump can be prosecuted over his efforts to undo his 2020 election loss to President Joe Biden.