Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
On March 12, 2007, Viacom sued YouTube, demanding $1 billion in damages, said that it had found more than 150,000 unauthorized clips of its material on YouTube that had been viewed "an astounding 1.5 billion times". YouTube responded by stating that it "goes far beyond its legal obligations in assisting content owners to protect their works". [4]
YouTube responded by stating that it "goes far beyond its legal obligations in assisting content owners to protect their works". [11] During the same court battle, Viacom won a court ruling requiring YouTube to hand over 12 terabytes of data detailing the viewing habits of every user who has watched videos on the site.
Baldoni's lawyer stated, In this vicious smear campaign fully orchestrated by Lively and her team, the New York Times cowered to the wants and whims of two powerful 'untouchable' Hollywood elites, disregarding journalistic practices and ethics once befitting of the revered publication by using doctored and manipulated texts and intentionally ...
The issues of freedom of speech and aesthetic values (taste) are primarily at home in media ethics. However a number of further issues distinguish media ethics as a field in its own right. A theoretical issue peculiar to media ethics is the identity of observer and observed. The press is one of the primary guardians in a democratic society of ...
Pew's deputy director observed that news reporting on YouTube was opening up the flow of information and forging new areas of cooperation and dialogue between citizens and news outlets. [44] Though YouTube executives denied the company itself intends to get into content creation, YouTube's news manager described it as a "catalyst" for creating ...
Recognize that legal access to information differs from an ethical justification to publish or broadcast. Realize that private people have a greater right to control information about themselves than public figures and others who seek power, influence or attention. Weigh the consequences of publishing or broadcasting personal information.
Content bias, differential treatment of the parties in political conflicts, where biased news presents only one side of the conflict. [10] Corporate bias, when stories are selected or slanted to please corporate owners of media. [11] [12] Coverage bias [13] when media choose to report only negative news about one party or ideology [14]
Chequebook journalism (American English: checkbook journalism) is the controversial practice of news reporters paying sources for their information.In the U.S. it is generally considered unethical, with most mainstream newspapers and news shows having a policy forbidding it.