Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Action research is an interactive inquiry process that balances problem-solving actions implemented in a collaborative context with data-driven collaborative analysis or research to understand underlying causes enabling future predictions about personal and organizational change.
Action teaching is a style of instruction that aims to teach students about subject material while also contributing to the betterment of society. [1] The approach represents an educational counterpart to action research, a method first developed by Kurt Lewin in the 1940s to address racial prejudice, anti-Semitism, and other societal problems through the integration of social science and ...
Action research in the workplace took its initial inspiration from Lewin's work on organizational development (and Dewey's emphasis on learning from experience). Lewin's seminal contribution involves a flexible, scientific approach to planned change that proceeds through a spiral of steps, each of which is composed of 'a circle of planning, action, and fact-finding about the result of the ...
As a cybernetic approach the ground idea of an action/ activity is the regulation. [6] Between the visible work activity and the non visible cognitive processes is a gap, which the Action-Regulation-Theory promise to close. [7] [8] Through a hierarchical-sequential structured model, action steps are supposed to be accurately captured and analysed.
Action Research is a quarterly peer-reviewed academic journal that covers the field of action research. The journal was established in 2003 and is published by SAGE Publications. The editor-in-chief is Hilary Bradbury (AR+ Foundation).
Dewey's theory is an attempt to shift the understandings of what is essential and characteristic about the art process from its physical manifestations in the ‘expressive object’ to the process in its entirety, a process whose fundamental element is no longer the material ‘work of art’ but rather the development of an ‘experience’.
The aesthetic–usability effect describes a paradox that people perceive more aesthetic designs as much more intuitive than those considered to be less aesthetically pleasing. The effect has been observed in several experiments and has significant implications regarding the acceptance, use, and performance of a design.
[10] [11] In the United States, affirmative action is controversial [12] and public opinion on the subject is divided. Supporters of affirmative action argue that it promotes substantive equality for group outcomes and representation for groups, which are socio-economically disadvantaged or have faced historical discrimination or oppression.