enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Titan IV - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titan_IV

    Titan IV was a family of heavy-lift space launch vehicles developed by Martin Marietta and operated by the United States Air Force from 1989 to 2005. [4] Launches were conducted from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida [5] and Vandenberg Air Force Base, California.

  3. Titan (rocket family) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titan_(rocket_family)

    The HGM-25A Titan I, built by the Martin Company, was the first version of the Titan family of rockets. It began as a backup ICBM project in case the SM-65 Atlas was delayed. It was a two-stage rocket operational from early 1962 to mid-1965 whose LR-87 booster engine was powered by RP-1 (kerosene) and liquid oxygen (LOX).

  4. Comparison of retired orbital launch systems - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_retired...

    For a list of proposed rocket configurations or individual configurations currently ... Lockheed Martin: 18.4 m ... Titan IVB United States: Lockheed Martin: 51.36 m ...

  5. Good News for Boeing and Lockheed: SpaceX Just Raised Its ...

    www.aol.com/finance/good-news-boeing-lockheed...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  6. Comparison of retired orbital launch vehicles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_retired...

    3,550 to escape with IUS: Yes 135 [119]: KSC: 1981 2011 SPARK United States UH Aerojet Rocketdyne Sandia: 17 m 300 No 1 Barking Sands: 2015 2015 Sparta United States ABMA/Chrysler: 21.8 m

  7. Comparison of orbital launcher families - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_orbital...

    A Saturn V rocket, one of the most powerful operational launch vehicles to date. This article compares different orbital launcher families (launchers which are significantly different from other members of the same 'family' have separate entries).

  8. Boeing and Lockheed Martin's New Space Rocket May Have ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/boeing-lockheed-martins...

    Good news and bad news. The good news is that losing a nozzle only decreased the rocket's efficiency. The fuel still burned. It still got pushed out in the right direction (i.e., down).

  9. DARPA Falcon Project - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARPA_Falcon_Project

    Falcon page on Darpa.mil; HCV page on Globalsecurity.org "Air Drops Dummy Rocket for Darpa's Falcon" Archived 2012-02-23 at the Wayback Machine, Aviation Week, "Hypersonics Back in the News" on Defensetech.org "Going Hypersonic: Flying FALCON for Defense" and "Air Force Plans Flight Tests Of Hypersonic Vehicle" on Space.com