Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Clean hands, sometimes called the clean hands doctrine, unclean hands doctrine, or dirty hands doctrine, [1] is an equitable defense in which the defendant argues that the plaintiff is not entitled to obtain an equitable remedy because the plaintiff is acting unethically or has acted in bad faith with respect to the subject of the complaint—that is, with "unclean hands".
Here contractual remedies cannot be enforced by a court on a defendant if it is manifest that the subject matter of the contract is either directly or by implication, contrary to public policy or in contradiction with any existing law or custom. A somewhat related concept in the law of contracts is the equitable defense of unclean hands.
The unclean hands cases of Keystone Driller v. General Excavator, Hazel-Atlas v. Hartford, and Precision v. Automotive formed the basis for the doctrine of inequitable conduct that developed and evolved over time. [2]
In response to the city's claim that Thomas had "unclean hands" in regard to his alleged role in harassing employees and his other rights as an alderman, Austin Fax, the attorney representing ...
Maxims of equity are legal maxims that serve as a set of general principles or rules which are said to govern the way in which equity operates. They tend to illustrate the qualities of equity, in contrast to the common law, as a more flexible, responsive approach to the needs of the individual, inclined to take into account the parties' conduct and worthiness.
Although the case is a mainstay of American legal education, the facts and the accuracy of this theory have been challenged by academic legal commentators. [2] Specifically, commentators argue that the court failed to take into account the history of shady deals that Lucy had left in his wake in an effort to buy properties rich in natural ...
Unclean gloves, bare hands noted by restaurant inspectors in Hilton Head and Bluffton. Lisa Wilson. December 12, 2023 at 2:23 PM. Kondor83/Getty Images.
In pari delicto (potior/melior est conditio possidentis), Latin for "in equal fault (better is the condition of the possessor)", [1] is a legal term used to refer to two persons or entities who are equally at fault, whether the malfeasance in question is a crime or tort.