Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In 1874, the U.S. government created the United States Reports, and retroactively numbered older privately-published case reports as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of U.S. Reports have dual citation forms; one for the volume number of U.S. Reports, and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called ...
The Supreme Court declined to follow the case of Computer Edge Pty. Ltd. v. Apple Computer, Inc. [3] decided by the High Court of Australia, which had virtually identical facts. In that case, the court held that the chips contained a "sequence of electrical impulses" which could not be subject to copyright.
Case name Citation Date decided Smith v. United States (1959) 360 U.S. 1: 1959: United States v. Atl. Refining Co. 360 U.S. 19: 1959: La. Power & Light Co. v. City of ...
McIntosh, [a] 21 U.S. (8 Wheat.) 543 (1823), also written M‘Intosh, is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that held that private citizens could not purchase lands from Native Americans. As the facts were recited by Chief Justice John Marshall , the successor in interest to a private purchase from the Piankeshaw attempted to ...
The discovery doctrine was expounded by the United States Supreme Court in a series of decisions, most notably Johnson v. McIntosh in 1823. In that case, Chief Justice John Marshall held that under generally accepted principles of international law:
McIntosh v. United States , 601 U.S. 330 (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a court's failure to enter a preliminary order imposing criminal forfeiture before sentencing does not necessarily bar a judge from ordering forfeiture at sentencing.
Johnson v. M'Intosh → Johnson v. McIntosh – This would bring the title in line with (1) the rest of the article, (2) the spelling of McCulloch v. Maryland (which, like McIntosh, was originally printed as "M‘Culloch"), (3) the modern spelling used by the U.S. Supreme Court, such as in County of Oneida v.
A week after signing with Matchroom, the Usyk vs. Bellew fight was announced to take place on 10 November at the Manchester Arena. [14] [15] Bellew's guaranteed purse for the fight was £4 million. [16] Speaking in the build up to the bout Bellew said "I feel fantastic. Fat boy is in shape. Usyk is in the deep end. There will be war.