Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Also, actual genetic findings may be overlooked if the locus is less prevalent in the population where the case subjects are chosen. For this reason, it was common in the 1990s to use family-based data where the effect of population structure can easily be controlled for using methods such as the transmission disequilibrium test (TDT). [28]
Population genetics is a subfield of genetics that deals with genetic differences within and among populations, and is a part of evolutionary biology.Studies in this branch of biology examine such phenomena as adaptation, speciation, and population structure.
In the human population, population genomics has been used to study the genetic change since humans began to migrate away from Africa approximately 50,000-100,000 years ago. It has been shown that not only were genes related to fertility and reproduction highly selected for, but also that the further humans moved away from Africa, the greater ...
The genomic control method is as robust as family-based designs, despite being applied to population-based data. [6] It has the potential to lead to a decrease in statistical power to detect a true association, and it may also fail to eliminate the biasing effects of population stratification. [ 7 ]
In contrast to population-based association, family-based association tests are becoming more popular. The family-based, Tran-disequilibirum test (TDT) has gained wide popularity in recent years, [ citation needed ] this method also focuses on alleles transmitted to affect offispring, but it is formulated to take account of both the linkage and ...
The effective population size (N e) is the size of an idealised population that would experience the same rate of genetic drift as the real population. The effective population size is normally smaller than the census population size N, partly because chance events prevent some individuals from breeding, and partly due to background selection and genetic hitchhiking.
This was somewhat surprising since the present day effective population size of humans is estimated to be only ~10,000. If true that means that the human lineage would have experienced an immense decrease of its effective population size (and thus genetic diversity) in its evolution. (see Toba catastrophe theory) A and B are two different loci ...
Evidence interpreted as indicating that Neanderthals had 2.5 to 3.7% modern human ancestry, as well as indicating that accounting for effects of modern human-introgressed DNA sequences results in reduction of estimates of Neanderthal population size by ~20%, and evidence of two distinct episodes of modern human gene flow into Neanderthal ...