enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Tedla v. Ellman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tedla_v._Ellman

    Tedla v. Ellman (280 N.Y. 124, 19 N.E. 2d 987) was a 1939 New York Court of Appeals case that was influential in establishing the bounds of the negligence per se doctrine. Ordinarily, a statutory violation automatically constitutes negligence .

  3. Case or Controversy Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_or_Controversy_Clause

    Article III, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution states: The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;—to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public ministers and Consuls;—to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;—to ...

  4. Re Akoto and 7 Others - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Re_Akoto_and_7_Others

    The case of Re Akoto and 7 Others is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of Ghana that challenged the legality of the Preventive Detention Act (PDA). [1] The case centered on the arrest of Baffour Akoto, the then Chief Linguist of the Asantehene, along with seven others, who were detained under the Preventive Detention Act (PDA).

  5. Ruiz v. Estelle - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruiz_v._Estelle

    The trial ended in 1979 with the ruling that the conditions of imprisonment within the TDC prison system constituted cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the United States Constitution, [2] with the original report issued in 1980, a 118-page decision by Judge William Justice (Ruiz v. Estelle, 503 F.Supp. 1295). [3]

  6. Rogers v. Tennessee - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogers_v._Tennessee

    Rogers v. Tennessee, 532 U.S. 451 (2001), was a U.S. Supreme Court case holding that there is no due process violation for lack of fair warning when pre-existing common law limitations on what acts constitute a crime, under a more broadly worded statutory criminal law, are broadened to include additional acts, even when there is no notice to the defendant that the court might undo the common ...

  7. Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Delgado - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and...

    Ohio and the principle of “mere questioning” in later cases, including INS v. Delgado. [ 1 ] The most important formulation of the principle as it relates to Delgado is that “law enforcement officials can approach and speak to individuals without the constraints of the Fourth Amendment’s reasonableness standard, so long as the encounter ...

  8. Is Alabama whining too much about missing the playoff? Yes ...

    www.aol.com/sports/alabama-whining-too-much...

    Disappointed with the outcome and felt we were one of the 12 best teams in the country. We had an extremely challenging schedule and recognize there were two games in particular that we did not ...

  9. Berkemer v. McCarty - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkemer_v._McCarty

    Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420 (1984), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court that ruled that a person in police custody following a misdemeanor traffic offense was entitled to the protections of the Fifth Amendment pursuant to the decision in Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966).