Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The doctrine is explained in Aro Mfg. Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co. [1] The Aro case states the rule in these terms: The decisions of this Court require the conclusion that reconstruction of a patented entity, comprised of unpatented elements, is limited to such a true reconstruction of the entity as to "in fact make a new article ...
Article III, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution states: The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;—to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public ministers and Consuls;—to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;—to ...
Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Hewitt: 21-984: 2023-2-22 Respondent Hewitt was not an executive exempt from the FLSA’s overtime pay guarantee; daily-rate workers, of whatever income level, qualify as paid on a salary basis only if the conditions set out in 29 CFR §541.604(b) are met. Bartenwerfer v. Buckley: 21-908: 2023-2-22
In 1796, Hylton v. United States was the first case decided by the Supreme Court involving a direct challenge to the constitutionality of an act of Congress, the Carriage Act of 1794 which imposed a "carriage tax". [2] The Court performed judicial review of the plaintiff's claim that the carriage tax was unconstitutional.
ECJ Advocate-General gives his opinion on the case [5] The opinion serves as advice to the ECJ 3 September 2014: ECJ answers the questions referred for a preliminary ruling [6] The answers are binding on the requesting court, and constitute a "factual precedent" for other EU courts. [8] Case is retracted or the court of appeal of Brussels rules [6]
The Comparative Constitutions Project is an academic study of the content of the world's constitutions from 1789 to 2022, with yearly updates. The project was founded by Zachary Elkins and Tom Ginsburg in 2005 when they were colleagues at the University of Illinois and fellows at the Cline Center for Advanced Social Research. [1]
The criteria for determining what constitutes a "substantial right" is somewhat vague, however, being that it varies from case to case, each presenting a slightly different interpretation of which rights are essential, or significant enough to warrant this sort of legal protection.
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that established the principle of judicial review, meaning that American courts have the power to strike down laws and statutes they find to violate the Constitution of the United States.