Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The following is a list of academicians, both past and present, who are widely renowned for their groundbreaking contributions to the field of educational psychology
This is a list of universities in the United States classified as research universities in the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Research institutions are a subset of doctoral degree-granting institutions and conduct research. These institutions "conferred at least 20 research/scholarship doctorates in 2019-20 and ...
An open and independent registry for contributor identification in research and academic publishing. List: biography, education, employment, works, grants, peer-review. Over 9.3 million profiles. Free ORCID Inc. Philosophy Documentation Center eCollection: Applied ethics, Philosophy, Religious studies
[16] A survey on higher education published by The Economist in 2005 commented ARWU as "the most widely used annual ranking of the world's research universities." [ 17 ] In 2010, The Chronicle of Higher Education called ARWU "the best-known and most influential global ranking of universities" [ 18 ] and Philip G. Altbach named ARWU's ...
Research productivity (weighed 20%)—The number of published articles of the last 11 years (10%) and the number of articles of the current year (10%). Research impact (weighed 30%)—Number of citations of the last 11 years (10%), the number of citations of the last two years (10%), and the average number of citations of the last 11 years (10%).
(Top) 1 Discipline-specific. Toggle Discipline-specific subsection. 1.1 Arts and humanities. 1.1.1 Business and economics. ... Chemistry Education Research and Practice;
The 2015/16 edition of the Times Higher Education World University Rankings rank the world's 800 best universities, while the 2016/17 installment will rank the world's top 980. [39] On 3 June 2010, Times Higher Education revealed the methodology which they proposed to use when compiling the new world university rankings. [40]
On 13 September 2011, the Times Higher Education announced that its 2011–2012 list will only rank the top 200 institutions. Phil Baty wrote that this was in the "interests of fairness," because "the lower down the tables you go, the more the data bunch up and the less meaningful the differentials between institutions become."