Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Royscot Trust Ltd v Rogerson [1991] EWCA Civ 12 is an English contract law case on misrepresentation.It examines the Misrepresentation Act 1967 and addresses the extent of damages available under s 2(1) for negligent misrepresentation.
The Hire-Purchase Act 1967 (Malay: Akta Sewa Beli 1967), is a Malaysian law which enacted to regulate the form and contents of hire-purchase agreements, the rights and duties of parties to such agreements and to make provisions for other matters connected therewith and incidental thereto.
Hire purchase A hire purchase ( HP ), [ 1 ] also known as an installment plan , is an arrangement whereby a customer agrees to a contract to acquire an asset by paying an initial installment (e.g., 40% of the total) and repaying the balance of the price of the asset plus interest over a period of time.
An Act to amend the provisions of the National Insurance Act 1965, [ah] the National Insurance (Industrial Injuries) Act 1965 [ai] and the Industrial Injuries and Diseases (Old Cases) Act 1967 [aj] as to contributions, benefit and insurable employments; to provide for the set-off of certain overpayments; to confer temporary power to increase ...
Mr Hudson relied on section 27 of the Hire Purchase Act 1964, which creates a statutory exception to the common law principle that "nemo dat quod non habet" (nobody can pass better title than he has), since a non-trade buyer of a car who buys in good faith from a hirer under a hire purchase agreement becomes the owner.
Hire-Purchase Act 1965. 1965 c. 66. ... (Repealed by Industrial Injuries and Diseases (Old Cases) Act 1967 (c. 34)) Rural Water Supplies and Sewerage Act 1965 (repealed)
A former California prison guard who pleaded no contest to solicitation of murder after hiring a hit man to kill his lover’s husband was sentenced Wednesday in Fresno County to six years in ...
Beswick v Beswick [1967] UKHL 2, [1968] AC 58 was a landmark English contract law case on privity of contract and specific performance.The House of Lords, overruling the decision of Lord Denning in the Court of Appeal, ruled that a person who was not party to a contract had no independent standing to sue to enforce it, even if the contract was clearly intended for their benefit.