Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Fact-checking is the process of verifying the factual accuracy of questioned reporting and statements. Fact-checking can be conducted before or after the text or content is published or otherwise disseminated.
Wikipedia articles can have poor quality in many ways including self-contradictions. [2] Those poor articles require improvement. Large platforms including YouTube [3] and Facebook [4] use Wikipedia's content to confirm the accuracy of the information in their own media collections.
In psychology, interpersonal accuracy (IPA) refers to an individual's ability to make correct inferences about others' internal states, traits, or other personal attributes. [1] For example, a person who is able to correctly recognize emotions, motivation, or thoughts in others demonstrates interpersonal accuracy.
In addition to accuracy of individual statements, it is an objective that articles provide overall accurate coverage of the topic, albeit the latter is less clear-cut. This includes balanced coverage, with inclusion weighted by degree of significance, informativeness on the topic, and directness of relevance to the topic.
In other cases, accuracy itself is under dispute: a certain question may indeed have a true answer, but nobody knows what it is yet, so a lack of complete information leads to people supporting a variety of possible answers. For example, the existence of extraterrestrial civilizations, or the existence of life on Europa, could be true or false ...
Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians, who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves.
Oskamp tested groups of clinical psychologists and psychology students on a multiple-choice task in which they drew conclusions from a case study. [37] Along with their answers, subjects gave a confidence rating in the form of a percentage likelihood of being correct. This allowed confidence to be compared against accuracy.
The study found that while the information in these articles tended to be accurate, the articles examined contained many errors of omission. [ 67 ] A 2012 study co-authored by Shane Greenstein examined a decade of Wikipedia articles on United States politics and found that the more contributors there were to a given article, the more neutral it ...