Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A Wikipedia article should be based on the best sources available for the topic at hand. When possible, this means academic and peer-reviewed publications or scholarly books. Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
A good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. Peer review of "Homemaking" Peer review of this article about a famous painting
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us
A Wikipedia article should be based on the best sources available for the topic at hand. When possible, this means academic and peer-reviewed publications or scholarly books. Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
For articles needing major clean-up, place {{Review|article}} at the top of the main page. For articles needing minor clean-up, place {{Review|article}} at the top of the talk page. sections. To mark specific sections instead of the whole article, place {{Review|section}} at the top of the section. remarks. Please do not subst: this template ...
To request a Peer review, edit the article talk page, add {} to the top of the page, and save the page. This will create this template ({{Peer review}}) with a link to a new peer review page for the article. Follow this link, and add your request in the edit box as instructed.
Main page; Contents; ... 3 Categories for pages using these templates. ... Toggle the table of contents. Template: Academic-written review/doc. Add languages. Add ...
A Wikipedia article should be based on the best sources available for the topic at hand. When possible, this means academic and peer-reviewed publications or scholarly books. Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?