Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Adhiniyam consists of 170 sections as opposed to the 167 sections in the previous Indian Evidence Act. Of these 167 sections, 23 sections have been modified, five removed, and one more section added. [7] [8] [9] [10]
The Indian Evidence Act, identified as Act no. 1 of 1872, [5] and called the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, has eleven chapters and 167 sections, and came into force on 1 September 1872. At that time, India was a part of the British Empire .
Reley's popular case covers the interpretation and application of Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, which governs the admissibility of electronic records in Indian courts. [13] [14] Pawan Reley has been advocating for the causes of manual scavengers and sewer cleaners on a pro bono basis for the past nine years.
T. R. Desai (1876-1914) was an Indian lawyer and author best known for writing books in Trust, Equity, Limitation, Easement, Government Tenders, Contract and Sale of Goods Act. He was the father of Justice S. T. Desai , Chief Justice of Gujarat and Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India.
Bankers Books Evidence Act 1891 18 Bengal Military Police Act 1892 5 Madras City Civil Court Act 1892 7 Partition Act 1893 4 Sir Dinshaw Maneckjee Petit Act 1893 6 Prisons Act 1894 9 Epidemic Disease Act 1897 3 General Clauses Act 1897 10 Live-stock Importation Act 1898 9 Central Provinces Tenancy Act 1898 11 Indian Stamp Act: 1899 2
Evidence Act (with its variations) is a stock short title used for legislation in Australia, India, Malaysia and the United Kingdom relating to evidence. The Bill for an Act with this short title will have been known as a Evidence Bill during its passage through Parliament .
The main question which arose was whether the rules of evidence in Indian banking would be governed by British legislation, as India was then a British colony. As a result, it was decide to adapt and adopt the Bankers' Books Evidence Act, 1879 of the British Parliament to Indian banking. The Indian Bankers' Books Evidence Act, 1891 was ...
[8] In this sense, the commentary is similar to a digest (nibandha) in that it attempts to draw into the commentary outside opinions about the same passages of the text which he is commenting on. Although he is commenting on the Yājñavalkya Smṛti , he cites numerous earlier commentators as well, including Viśvarūpa, [ 9 ] Mēdhātithi ...