enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walker_v._Texas_Division...

    Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, 576 U.S. 200 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that license plates are government speech and are consequently more easily regulated/subjected to content restrictions than private speech under the First Amendment.

  3. United States defamation law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_defamation_law

    Though the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was designed to protect freedom of the press, for most of the history of the United States, the U.S. Supreme Court failed to use it to rule on libel cases. This left libel laws, based upon the traditional "Common Law" of defamation inherited from the English legal system, mixed across the states.

  4. Calder v. Jones - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calder_v._Jones

    Calder v. Jones, 465 U.S. 783 (1984), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a court within a state could assert personal jurisdiction over the author and editor of a national magazine which published an allegedly libelous article about a resident of that state, and where the magazine had wide circulation in that state.

  5. Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. Connaughton - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harte-Hanks_Communications...

    In the case, the Court held that departure from responsible reporting and unreasonable reporting conduct alone were not sufficient to award a public figure damages in a libel case. However, the Court also ruled that if reporters wrote with reckless disregard for the truth, which included ignoring obvious sources for their report, plaintiffs ...

  6. How the Supreme Court could break the internet as we know it

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-could-break...

    The justices have agreed to take on two cases that challenge the fundamental legal foundation that has guided online life for decades. How the Supreme Court could break the internet as we know it ...

  7. Time, Inc. v. Firestone - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time,_Inc._v._Firestone

    Court cases [ edit ] Time alleged that Mary was a public figure and could not recover damages based on the ruling of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964), which protected media from liability in such suits except in cases where there is knowledge of falsity or a reckless disregard for truth. [ 2 ]

  8. Supreme Court hears landmark cases on free speech and social ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-hears-landmark...

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday is hearing arguments on whether laws proposed by Texas and Florida to ban social media companies from removing content are constitutional. Here's everything you ...

  9. Supreme Court avoids ruling on law shielding internet ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-sidesteps...

    The Supreme Court on Thursday sided with Google, Twitter and Facebook in lawsuits seeking to hold them liable for terrorist attacks. In the case of an American college student who was killed in an ...