enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ignorantia juris non excusat - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignorantia_juris_non_excusat

    In law, ignorantia juris non excusat (Latin for "ignorance of the law excuses not"), [1] or ignorantia legis neminem excusat ("ignorance of law excuses no one"), [2] is a legal principle holding that a person who is unaware of a law may not escape liability for violating that law merely by being unaware of its content.

  3. Judicial notice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_notice

    Courts have ruled that judicial notice must be taken of federal public laws and treaties, state public laws, and official regulations of both federal and local government agencies. A trial court's decision to take judicial notice or not to do so is reviewed on appeal under the standard of abuse of discretion. [5]

  4. Civil penalty - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_penalty

    If they are not satisfied, they would have to issue a county court summons, which might not be cost effective. In type (iii) where one has parked on private land without permission, a typical notice might read: "In parking on this land, you hereby accept that your vehicle will be clamped and a £100 release charged".

  5. Brady disclosure - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brady_disclosure

    In California, there is a carefully prescribed procedure governing such request, and making disclosure without an order is a crime. The statutory scheme was developed, in part, because law enforcement departments had developed a practice of purging their files concerning misconduct claims made against their officers.

  6. Recusal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recusal

    Judicial disqualification laws existed in Roman law and early Jewish law, which disqualified judges from serving on cases of family, friends or enemies. [1]Civil law countries still have significant disqualification privileges, whereas common law countries, such as England, went in a different direction where recusal was required less often. [1]

  7. Stump v. Sparkman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stump_v._Sparkman

    The chambers of the Circuit Court judge are at upper left. Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978), is the leading United States Supreme Court decision on judicial immunity. It involved an Indiana judge who was sued by a young woman who had been sterilized without her knowledge as a minor in accordance with the judge's order. The Supreme Court ...

  8. County Court judgment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/County_Court_judgment

    Judgments for monetary sums are entered on the statutory Register of Judgments, Orders and Fines, [3] which is checked by credit reference agencies to assess the credit-worthiness of individuals. [4] An alleged debtor is sent postal notification of an impending County Court case, and has fourteen days to respond, by paying the money, admitting ...

  9. County court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/County_court

    County court is the name given to the intermediate court in one Australian state, namely the County Court of Victoria (in other states and territories it is called the 'District Court'). They hear indictable (serious) criminal offences except for treason , murder , and manslaughter . [ 2 ]