Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Since PIA concerns an organization's ability to keep private information safe, the PIA should be completed whenever said organization is in possession of the personal information on its employees, clients, customers and business contacts etc.
To directly remedy this shortcoming, the U.S. Army began the development of a set of software analysis modules in the mid-1980s. [6] This set of modules was called HARDMAN III, and although the name was the same, it used a fundamentally different approach for addressing MPT concerns than previous methods by providing an explicit link between ...
The choice of level is based on an impact assessment; governments have their own criteria, including how to determine the classification of an information asset and rules on how to protect information classified at each level. This process often includes security clearances for personnel handling the information.
Introduced in the Senate as S. 3418 by Samuel Ervin Jr. (D–NC) on May 1, 1974; Committee consideration by Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs; Passed the Senate on November 21, 1974 ()
Large data holders' highest ranking corporate officers and data security officers would have had to certify reasonable compliance with the Federal Trade Commission. Large data holders would have needed to provide a privacy impact assessment of their controls and risk to users every two years. [1]
A privacy impact assessment is another tool within this context and its use does not imply that privacy engineering is being practiced. One area of concern is the proper definition and application of terms such as personal data, personally identifiable information, anonymisation and pseudo-anonymisation which lack sufficient and detailed enough ...
DHS produced a 'privacy impact assessment' in 2008. It described the system as comprising: [10] A remote cardiovascular and respiratory sensor to measure heart rate and respiration; A remote eye tracker; Thermal cameras that provide information on the temperature of the skin in the face
Rating Description A: Reliable No doubt about the source's authenticity, trustworthiness, or competency.History of complete reliability. B: Usually reliable Minor doubts. History of mostly valid informa