enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Help:Reverting - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Reverting

    Reverting a contribution is sometimes appropriate. However, reverting good-faith actions of other editors can also be disruptive and may lead to the reverter being temporarily blocked from editing. The three-revert rule (part of the edit warring policy) limits the number of times an editor can revert edits (including partial reversions) on a page.

  3. Wikipedia:Reverting - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reverting

    Edit wars destabilize the article in question and may be off-putting to the observant and wary editors who would otherwise contribute stabilizing improvements to it. Edit wars tend to cause ill-will, delay editor development, and reduce editor retention. An editor can feel a revert is "a slap in the face" – "I worked hard and someone reverted ...

  4. Help : Wikipedia: The Missing Manual/Editing, creating, and ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Wikipedia:_The...

    There's one advantage to using the classic revert: Unlike an undo, with a revert it's impossible to have an edit conflict (see the section about edit conflicts). If you're reverting vandalism on a high-traffic page (today's featured article on the Main Page is a prominent example), an edit conflict could significantly slow your fixing of some ...

  5. Wikipedia:Revert only when necessary - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Revert_only_when...

    No edit, reversion or not, should be made for the purpose of teaching another editor a lesson or keeping an editor from enjoying the fruits of their crimes. Do not revert an edit as a means of showing your disapproval of the edit summary. Do not revert an edit because you need more time to determine whether you agree with the edit.

  6. Wikipedia:Rollback

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Rollback

    To revert edits by banned or blocked users in defiance of their block or ban (but be prepared to explain this use of rollback when asked to) To revert widespread edits (by a misguided editor or malfunctioning bot) unhelpful to the encyclopedia, provided that you supply an explanation in an appropriate location, such as at the relevant talk page [1]

  7. Wikipedia : Administrators' guide/Rollback

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators...

    Additional relevant information can be found at Help:Reverting#Rollback.. As an admin (or rollbacker), you may spend much of your time reverting changes made to pages. You may be familiar with the undo feature, which undoes the last edit to a page, and manual reverts, which allow you to revert to any edit of a page by opening any page history revision, clicking edit, and saving.

  8. Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BOLD,_revert...

    Revert an edit if you disagree with it and cannot immediately refine it. If you revert, be specific about your reasons in the edit summary or on the talk page. BRD does not encourage reverting, but recognizes that reversions happen. Always follow the editing policy and revert only when necessary. Discuss your bold edit with the person who ...

  9. Wikipedia:Edit warring - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Edit_warring

    The three-revert rule is a convenient limit for occasions when an edit war is happening fairly quickly; it is not a definition of "edit warring", and it is absolutely possible to engage in edit warring without breaking the three-revert rule, or even coming close to doing so.