Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
"The Argument from Unbelief" at Philosophy of Religion .Info: Offers a simple overview and rebuttal. Responses to the problem of Divine Hiddenness from the website of the Christian Colligation of Apologetics Debate Research & Evangelism. Daniel Howard-Snyder. Academic papers and books by one of the most respected critics of Schellenberg's argument.
Pascal addressed the difficulty that reason and rationality pose to genuine belief by proposing that "acting as if [one] believed" could "cure [one] of unbelief": But at least learn your inability to believe, since reason brings you to this, and yet you cannot believe.
Doubt is a mental state in which the mind remains suspended between two or more contradictory propositions, and is uncertain about them. [ 1 ] [ better source needed ] Doubt on an emotional level is indecision between belief and disbelief .
Belief-in is used in a similar sense when expressing self-confidence or faith in one's self or one's abilities. Defenders of a reductive account of belief-in have used this line of thought to argue that belief in God can be analyzed in a similar way: e.g. that it amounts to a belief that God exists with his characteristic attributes, like ...
Catholic mystic Evelyn Underhill [5] wrote: . It is clear that under ordinary conditions, and save for sudden gusts of "Transcendental Feeling" induced by some saving madness such as Religion, Art, or Love, the superficial self knows nothing of the attitude of this silent watcher—this "Dweller in the Innermost"—towards the incoming messages of the external world: nor of the activities ...
Andy Cohen Opens Up About the Self-Doubt He Experiences as a Single Dad: 'A Whole New World of Worry' Emma Aerin Becker. September 17, 2024 at 3:11 PM.
A self-refuting idea or self-defeating idea is an idea or statement whose falsehood is a logical consequence of the act or situation of holding them to be true. Many ideas are called self-refuting by their detractors, and such accusations are therefore almost always controversial, with defenders stating that the idea is being misunderstood or that the argument is invalid.
Cartesian doubt is a form of methodological skepticism associated with the writings and methodology of René Descartes (March 31, 1596–February 11, 1650). [1] [2]: 88 Cartesian doubt is also known as Cartesian skepticism, methodic doubt, methodological skepticism, universal doubt, systematic doubt, or hyperbolic doubt.