enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Hodges v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hodges_v._United_States

    The first case, filed as United States v. Morris, involved a group of 11 men accused of targeting sharecroppers. The second, United States v. Maples, accused 15 men of intimidating Black workers at a lumber mill in Whitehall, Arkansas. The case against them was made primarily under two statutes of the U.S. Code. [3]

  3. Electronic harassment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_harassment

    Electronic harassment, electromagnetic torture, or psychotronic torture is the delusional belief, held by individuals who call themselves "targeted individuals" (TIs), that malicious actors are transmitting sounds and thoughts into people's heads, affecting their bodies, and harassing them generally.

  4. Gang stalking - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gang_stalking

    This is important in the assessment of risk in stalking cases, early referral to psychiatric services and allocation of police resources." [13] While a great majority of those who claim to be targeted individuals do not pose danger to others, [14] one report found that some have acted out with violence, sometimes extreme. [15]

  5. Non-compete clauses in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-compete_clauses_in_the...

    A 2023 petition to the FTC to ban non-compete agreements estimated that about 30 million workers (about 20% of all U.S. workers) were subject to a noncompete clause. [3] While higher-wage workers are comparatively more likely to be covered by non-compete clauses, non-competes covered 14 percent of workers without college degrees in 2018. [4]

  6. Hutto v. Finney - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hutto_v._Finney

    Finney, 437 U.S. 678 (1978), is a landmark Supreme Court case against the Arkansas Department of Correction. The litigation lasted almost a decade, from 1969 through 1978. It was the first successful lawsuit filed by an inmate against a correctional institution. The case also clarified the Arkansas prison system's unacceptable punitive measures.

  7. Do college football coaches think new enforcement arm will ...

    www.aol.com/college-football-coaches-think...

    The new power conference-led enforcement entity is poised to implement significant penalties for those breaching the rules around rev-sharing with players, including fines, suspensions and more.

  8. Arkansas Legal Services Partnership - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arkansas_Legal_Services...

    The Center for Arkansas Legal Services (CALS) and Legal Aid of Arkansas (Legal Aid) are 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations that provide free legal services to low-income individuals residing in the state of Arkansas in civil (non-criminal) cases, ranging from family to consumer and housing to individual rights cases. Together the two programs ...

  9. Holt v. Hobbs - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holt_v._Hobbs

    Holt v. Hobbs, 574 U.S. 352 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously ruled that an Arkansas prison policy which prohibited a Muslim prisoner from growing a short beard in accordance with his religious beliefs violated the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA).