Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The whole tiered strategy developed by the Court is meant to reconcile the principle of equal protection with the reality that most laws necessarily discriminate in some way. [ 75 ] Choosing the standard of scrutiny can determine the outcome of a case, and the strict scrutiny standard is often described as "strict in theory and fatal in fact ...
Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), was a landmark case of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning affirmative action in student admissions.The Court held that a student admissions process that favors "underrepresented minority groups" did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause so long as it took into account other factors evaluated on an individual ...
The Equal Educational Opportunities Act (EEOA) of 1974 is a federal law of the United States of America.It prohibits discrimination against faculty, staff, and students, including racial segregation of students, and requires school districts to take action to overcome barriers to students' equal participation.
A new proposal that will require parents to provide proof of citizenship or immigration status for enrolling students in Oklahoma public schools received unanimous approval by the State Board of ...
Required states to implement standardized tests and penalized schools with poor performance. Pub. L. 107–110 (text) 2002 Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students Act of 2001: Waived student financial aid requirements for military service-members affected by national emergencies declared by reason of terrorist attacks.
This portion of the law has drawn a fair amount of criticism and has even led to political resistance. For instance, in 2003 in Santa Cruz, California, student-led efforts forced school districts to create an "opt-in" policy that required students affirm they wanted the military to have their information. This successful student organizing ...
The Act provides that if a school receives federal aid and has a "limited open forum," or at least one student-led non-curriculum club that meets outside of class time, it must allow additional such clubs to be organized, and must give them equal access to meeting spaces and school publications.
[23] [55] Teachers have the right, under the first amendment, to communicate their opinions regarding student grades, [58] [65] but institutions are required to meet students implied contract rights to fair grading practices. Departments may change grades issued by teachers which are not in line with grading policies or are unfair or unreasonable.