enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Parker immunity doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parker_immunity_doctrine

    The Parker immunity doctrine is an exemption from liability for engaging in antitrust violations. It applies to the state when it exercises legislative authority in creating a regulation with anticompetitive effects, and to private actors when they act at the direction of the state after it has done so.

  3. Parker v. Brown - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parker_v._Brown

    Parker v. Brown , 317 U.S. 341 (1943), was a United States Supreme Court case on the scope of United States antitrust law . It held that actions taken by state governments were exempt from the scope of the Sherman Act .

  4. North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Carolina_State_Board...

    [4] That said, Justice Kennedy notes that the States' power to regulate would be "impermissibly burdened" if they had to obey United States antitrust law. [5] To address this, the Court in Parker v. Brown (1943) granted California immunity from federal antitrust laws after the state created a New Deal raisin cartel.

  5. Category : State sovereign immunity in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:State_sovereign...

    Parker immunity doctrine This page was last edited on 20 March 2012, at 05:40 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 ...

  6. State action immunity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_action_immunity

    State action immunity may refer to: Act of state doctrine - legal doctrine that sovereign states must respect the independence of other sovereign states Parker immunity doctrine - legal doctrine in U.S. courts that certain acts of the U.S. state governments are immune from antitrust liability

  7. Qualified immunity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualified_immunity

    Qualified immunity applies only to government officials in civil litigation, and does not protect the government itself from suits arising from officials' actions. [4] The U.S. Supreme Court first introduced the qualified immunity doctrine in Pierson v. Ray, a case litigated during the height of the civil rights movement. It is stated to have ...

  8. Special counsel's filing could contain new evidence in Jan. 6 ...

    www.aol.com/special-counsels-filing-could...

    The judge overseeing former President Donald Trump's federal election interference case on Tuesday granted special counsel Jack Smith's request to file a 180-page brief on presidential immunity ...

  9. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copperweld_Corp._v...

    Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp., 467 U.S. 752 (1984), is a major US antitrust law case decided by the Supreme Court concerning the Pittsburgh firm Copperweld Corporation and the Chicago firm Independence Tube. [1]