enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Parker immunity doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parker_immunity_doctrine

    The Parker immunity doctrine is an exemption from liability for engaging in antitrust violations. It applies to the state when it exercises legislative authority in creating a regulation with anticompetitive effects, and to private actors when they act at the direction of the state after it has done so.

  3. North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Carolina_State_Board...

    Virginia State Bar (1975) found Parker immunity required what Justice Kennedy calls “more than a mere facade of state involvement”. Because the Sherman Act was designed to break private monopolies, [6] Justice Kennedy does not accept that the "congressional judgment" was to allow the States to delegate their immunity to a private monopoly. [7]

  4. Parker v. Brown - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parker_v._Brown

    Parker v. Brown , 317 U.S. 341 (1943), was a United States Supreme Court case on the scope of United States antitrust law . It held that actions taken by state governments were exempt from the scope of the Sherman Act .

  5. Qualified immunity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualified_immunity

    Qualified immunity is a doctrine of federal law, not affected by changes in state law. Nonetheless, some states have passed what they deem to be modifications of qualified immunity in the context of state law claims. These changes do not impact the doctrine of qualified immunity as applied to federal constitutional law.

  6. Category : State sovereign immunity in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:State_sovereign...

    Parker immunity doctrine This page was last edited on 20 March 2012, at 05:40 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 ...

  7. Sotomayor Is Right: The Supreme Court Should Reevaluate ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/sotomayor-supreme-court...

    The doctrine makes it nearly impossible for victims of prosecutorial misconduct to get recourse. Sotomayor Is Right: The Supreme Court Should Reevaluate Absolute Immunity for Prosecutors Skip to ...

  8. Trump plans to seek Supreme Court review of Jan. 6 civil ...

    www.aol.com/news/trump-plans-seek-supreme-court...

    Donald Trump plans to ask the Supreme Court to hear his claim that presidential immunity should shield him from civil suits related to the Jan. 6 riot, his attorneys said in a court filing Monday.

  9. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Stone Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Summary Curry v United States: 314 U.S. 14 (1941) Ruled that a prime contractor to the federal government is an independent contractor and not an agent of the government. [1] Edwards v. California: 314 U.S. 160 (1941) Commerce Clause, privileges and immunities clause of the 14th Amendment: Lisenba v. People of State of California: 314 U.S. 219 ...