enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Terry v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_v._Ohio

    Terry v. Ohio , 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the court ruled that it is constitutional for American police to "stop and frisk" a person they reasonably suspect to be armed and involved in a crime.

  3. Terry stop - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_stop

    The Terry stop operates under the assumption that although stop-and-frisk is an intrusion, the potential harm from weapons outweighs it. [16] The cases following Terry expanded the power of the police. While the original case was concerned with armed violence and firsthand observation by officers, Adams v.

  4. Stop and identify statutes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_and_identify_statutes

    For example, California "stop and identify" law, Penal Code §647(e) had wording [37] [38] [39] similar to the Nevada law upheld in Hiibel, but a California appellate court, in People v. Solomon (1973), 33 Cal.App.3d 429 construed the law to require "credible and reliable" identification that carries a "reasonable assurance" of its authenticity.

  5. List of Terry stop case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Terry_stop_case_law

    Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961) — incorporated exclusionary rule against the states; Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) — stop and frisk for weapons OK for officer safety; Sibron v. New York, 392 U.S. 40 (1968) — companion case to Terry. Peters v. New York (1968) — companion case to Terry contained in Sibron

  6. Michigan v. Long - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan_v._Long

    Michigan v. Long, 463 U.S. 1032 (1983), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court that extended Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) to allow searches of car compartments during a stop with reasonable suspicion.

  7. US Supreme Court to decide if white, straight workers face ...

    www.aol.com/news/us-supreme-court-decide-white...

    The Cincinnati, Ohio-based 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decided last year that she had not shown the "background circumstances" that courts require to prove that she faced discrimination ...

  8. Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiibel_v._Sixth_Judicial...

    Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada, 542 U.S. 177 (2004), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a statute requiring suspects to disclose their names during a valid Terry stop does not violate the Fourth Amendment if the statute first requires reasonable suspicion of criminal involvement, and does not violate the Fifth Amendment if there is no ...

  9. Ohio traffic laws: Here's what changed in 2023 and what could ...

    www.aol.com/ohio-traffic-laws-heres-changed...

    From January 2021 to the beginning of November 2021, there were nearly 10,200 crashes, 10,500 citations and 32 fatal crashes. In the same 2023 time frame, there were 7,400 crashes, 6,800 citations ...