Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
US law authorizing retaliation against violations of trade agreements Section 301 of the U.S. Trade Act of 1974 (Pub. L. 93–618, 19 U.S.C. § 2411, last amended March 23, 2018) authorizes the President to take all appropriate action, including tariff-based and non-tariff-based retaliation, to obtain the removal of any act, policy, or practice of a foreign government that violates an ...
To remove the sunset provision of section 203 of Public Law 105-384, and for other purposes. Pub. L. 115–49 (text) 115-50: August 18, 2017 Rapid DNA Act of 2017 To establish a system for integration of Rapid DNA instruments for use by law enforcement to reduce violent crime and reduce the current DNA analysis backlog.
Signed into law by President Gerald Ford on January 3, 1975 The Trade Act of 1974 ( Pub. L. 93–618 , 88 Stat. 1978 , enacted January 3, 1975 , codified at 19 U.S.C. ch. 12 [ 1 ] ) was passed to give the President more power in matters of trade agreements and tariffs.
The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices.
Acceptance of Gifts Act of October 10, 1978 (7 USC 2269, Public Law 95-442) - Authorizes FS acceptance of cash and donations of real personal property. Cooperative Funds and Deposits Act of December 12, 1975 (16 USC 565a1-a3, Public Law 94-148) - Authorizes FS and partners to perform work from which they would accrue mutual non-monetary benefit.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Pages for logged out editors learn more
Title III (sections 301-310) outlines policies for the application of federal procurement and methods for acquisition procedures, electronic commerce capability, competition, solicitation of services, evaluation, and validation of proprietary data. Additionally, regulation of interaction between contracting agencies and the GSA is detailed here.
Further, Congress intended to allow judicial review of the Office's failure to implement this regulation under Public Law 94-574. Cervase thus had standing to sue the government. However, a dissent filed by Judge Garth noted that a general subject index was available, which satisfied Congress' requirement. [29] That same year, in United States v.