Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Named after its legislative sponsors, the Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act (California Government Code §6584-6599.1) is a law enacted by the California Legislature in 1985. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] The main purpose of this statute is to allow local California governments to work together to get financing in a way that will conceivably lower borrowing costs.
For example, imagine you pay federal tax at a 24 percent rate and state tax at a rate of 6 percent, and the municipal bond offers a yield of 3 percent.
Where r m = interest rate of municipal bond, r c = interest rate of comparable corporate bond and t = investor's tax bracket (also known as marginal tax rate): [35] = For example, assume an investor in the 38% tax bracket is offered a municipal bond that has a tax-exempt yield of 1.0%.
This is essentially how tax-free municipal bonds work. Investors lend money to the government in exchange for periodic interest payments until the bond reaches its maturity date, at which point ...
Positive, tax-free carry can reach into the double digits. The bet in municipal bond arbitrage is that, over a longer period of time, two similar instruments--municipal bonds and interest rate swaps--will correlate with each other; they are both very high quality credits, have the same maturity and are denominated in U.S. dollars.
The existing supermajority requirement for local bond approval goes back to the series of tax restrictions in California's Constitution inaugurated by the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978.
That perception could thus potentially allow a local government to borrow at a lower interest rate, saving its taxpayers' money over the life of the bonds. Despite that advantage, many states, such as California under Proposition 13, do not allow local governments to issue unlimited-tax general obligation debt without a public vote.
The funds raised from a TAD are placed in a tax-free bond (finance) where the money can continue to grow. These improvements are typically for revitalization and especially to complete redevelopment efforts. Tax-increment financing has attracted much criticism as merely a subsidy to connected developers. California, where the practice began ...