Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that under the Due Process Clause of the Constitution of the United States, the prosecution must turn over to a criminal defendant any significant evidence in its possession that suggests the defendant is not guilty (exculpatory evidence).
v. t. e. In the legal system of the United States, a Brady disclosure consists of exculpatory or impeaching information and evidence that is material to the guilt or innocence or to the punishment of a defendant. The term comes from the 1963 U.S. Supreme Court case Brady v. Maryland, [1] in which the Supreme Court ruled that suppression by the ...
Ginsburg, joined by Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan. Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. 51 (2011), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court considered whether a prosecutor's office can be held liable for a single Brady violation by one of its members on the theory that the office provided inadequate training.
A new prosecutor will have to appear in court by Tuesday in YNW Melly’s double murder case. ... The discovery of Brady violations, in some cases, have even led to overturned convictions ...
Under Florida law, prosecutors are required to disclose any information that may be favorable to the defense. The discovery of Brady violations, in some cases, have even led to overturned convictions.
The discovery of Brady violations, in some cases, have even led to overturned convictions. Lead prosecutor called to stand Bradley also testified Friday, detailing her account of the incident and ...
United States of America v. Michael T. Flynn. Michael Flynn pleads guilty to making false statements under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, before withdrawing his plea prior to sentencing, with case assigned to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Flynn alleges prosecutors are guilty of violations under Brady v.
Prosecutorial misconduct. In jurisprudence, prosecutorial misconduct or prosecutorial overreach is "an illegal act or failing to act, on the part of a prosecutor, especially an attempt to sway the jury to wrongly convict a defendant or to impose a harsher than appropriate punishment." [1] It is similar to selective prosecution.