enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Mednax CEO, board directors replaced amid settlement with ...

    www.aol.com/news/mednax-ceo-board-directors...

    Mark Ordan, who had been CEO at real estate company Quality Care Properties, was tapped to replace Roger Medel, who founded Mednax, valued at $1.5 billion, four decades ago, the company said.

  3. Claim Your Money From All These Class Action Settlements ...

    www.aol.com/claim-money-class-action-settlements...

    Total settlement: $60 million. Deadline to file claim: May 18, 2023. Requirements: Must have been an unlimited data customer between Oct. 1, 2011 and June 30, 2015.

  4. Were Hedge Funds Right About Buying Mednax Inc. (MD)? - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/were-hedge-funds-buying-mednax...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  5. Bought This Ice Cream? Here's How to Claim Your Share of an ...

    www.aol.com/bought-ice-cream-heres-claim...

    Recently, an $8.85 million settlement was reached in a class action lawsuit filed against Unilever United States, Inc., the owner of Breyers, and Conopco, Inc., the New York-based advertiser ...

  6. How to file a claim to get $2,500 from a Cash App settlement

    www.aol.com/file-claim-2-500-cash-220654189.html

    Cash App customers may be able to claim more than $2,500 each as part of a $15 million class-action settlement for data and security breaches at the mobile payment service.

  7. Rodolfo Ruiz - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rodolfo_Ruiz

    Ruiz received a Bachelor of Arts from Duke University.He earned his Juris Doctor in 2005 from the Georgetown University Law Center.He began his legal career as a law clerk to Judge Federico A. Moreno of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

  8. Here's Why You Should Steer Clear of MEDNAX (MD) at Present - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/heres-why-steer-clear-mednax...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  9. FTC v. Actavis, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FTC_v._Actavis,_Inc.

    FTC v. Actavis, Inc., 570 U.S. 136 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court held that the FTC could make an antitrust challenge under the rule of reason against a so-called pay-for-delay agreement, also referred to as a reverse payment patent settlement.