Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
If a person has a medical condition, say just that, specifying the condition to the extent that is relevant and supported by appropriate sources. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Medicine-related articles § Careful language for more guidance on writing about medical conditions. Norms vary for expressions about disabilities and disabled people.
This Manual of Style (MoS or MOS) is the style manual for all English Wikipedia articles (though provisions related to accessibility apply across the entire project, not just to articles). This primary page is supported by further detail pages , which are cross-referenced here and listed at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Contents .
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch (MOS:WTW) Techniques for recognizing and dealing with puffery (MOS:PUFF) , charged words (MOS:LABEL and MOS:CLAIM) , weasel and doubtful words (MOS:WEASEL and MOS:ALLEGED) , editorializing (MOS:EDITORIAL) , euphemisms (MOS:EUPHEMISM) , clichés (MOS:CLICHE) and rapidly dated expressions (MOS:RELTIME) are ...
In addition to the Manual of Style, keep these style tips in mind: Do not use second-person pronouns ("you"). In addition to being ambiguous, informal, and unencyclopedic, we cannot assume that the reader is familiar with the show. Use proper nouns for character names. See also Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Avoid second-person pronouns.
Manual of Style Wikipedia:WikiProject Manual of Style Template:WikiProject Manual of Style Manual of Style: This page falls under the contentious topics procedure and is given additional attention, as it closely associated to the English Wikipedia Manual of Style, and the article titles policy. Both areas are subjects of debate.
This guideline is Words to watch, and there are two sorts of euphemisms editors needs to watch out for: words and phrases that are always euphemistic, and words and phrases that are properly encyclopedic in some contexts but euphemistic in others. It would lower the quality and effectiveness of our guideline to cut out the second sort from ...
An article should generally be placed at the publication's official title, taken from the indicia rather than the cover. In cases of several comic book titles of the same name from the same publisher, X-Men, volume 1; X-Men, volume 2; etc. is the standard (note the use of a comma separating the publication from the volume number).
I have put back the template {}. If it is agreed that as of yet there is no consensus for a merge, then it is not wise to have a new guideline repeating what the older guidelines