Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Supreme Court on Monday appeared to have deep concerns of state laws enacted in Florida and Texas that would would prohibit social media platforms from throttling certain political viewpoints.
Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo, [a] 418 U.S. 241 (1974), was a seminal First Amendment ruling by the United States Supreme Court. [2] The Supreme Court overturned a Florida state law that required newspapers to offer equal space to political candidates who wished to respond to election-related editorials or endorsements.
The Supreme Court also heard arguments Monday for and against a Texas law that says big social media platforms ... law could impact other platforms. "Florida's law, so far as I can understand it ...
The Supreme Court on Monday kept on hold efforts by Texas and Florida to limit how Facebook, TikTok, X, YouTube and other social media platforms regulate content posted by their users in a ruling ...
House Bill 757 is an affront to free speech and probably unconstitutional, a mechanism for public figures to silence negative coverage with the threat of litigation.
In an 8-0 decision in favor of the State of Florida, Chief Justice Burger wrote the opinion for the Supreme Court. Citing Estes v. Texas (1964), the Court denied Chandler's claim that a media presence in the courtroom is offensive to due process. So long as the "evolving technology" does not infringe on "fundamental guarantees" of the accused ...
Trying cases in the court of public opinion refers to using the media to influence public support for one side or the other in a court case. This can result in persons outside the justice system (i.e. people other than the judge or jury) taking action for or against a party.
A new law that's set to take effect in Florida in January aims to protect minors on social media. It calls for a ban for those under 16 and poses an enforcement issue.