Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
“Loving yourself can and should happen even when you’re at what you feel is your ‘worst,’” she said of so-called unconditional self-love. “People are happier and end up being more ...
Furthermore, it appears that computer-based communication increases the ability for people to communicate, but is often only utilized between those who already know each other through pre-existing circumstances. Although this article is focused on the proximity aspect of the Principles of Attraction, it is important to note other principles.
Haptic communication is nonverbal communication and interaction via the sense of touch. Touch can come in many different forms, some can promote physical and psychological well-being. A warm, loving touch can lead to positive outcomes while a violent touch can ultimately lead to a negative outcome.
British dictionary definition is "the ability to communicate effectively with people in a friendly way, especially in business" or personal effectiveness skills. [4] In business it is a connection among people in a humane level to achieve productivity. [5] Portland Business Journal describes people skills as: [6]
To love yourself more truly and deeply, it helps to try to unpack all those layers of social conditioning that were piled on us over a lifetime, and which strip away our ability to just love ...
Nicomachean Ethics Book 9, Chapter 8 focuses on it particularly. In this passage, Aristotle argues that people who love themselves to achieve unwarranted personal gain are bad, but those who love themselves to achieve virtuous principles are the best sort of good. He says the former kind of self-love is much more common than the latter.
Nobody’s Perfect. Look it: We all have problems. We all have challenges. And we live in a broken world, and it’s never going to be fixed. We can hope so.
Proactivity is about taking responsibility for one's reaction to one's own experiences, taking the initiative to respond positively and improve the situation. Covey postulates, in a discussion of the work of psychiatrist Viktor Frankl, that between stimulus and response lies a person's ability to choose how to react, and that nothing can hurt a person without the person's consent.