enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montgomery_v_Lanarkshire...

    The Supreme Court departed and overruled the earlier House of Lords case in Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital, in reconsidering the duty of care of a doctor towards a patient on medical treatment. The case changed the Bolam test to a greater test in medical negligence by introducing the general duty to attempt the ...

  3. Medical law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_law

    May keep evidence intact and preserved for trial (such as defective medicines or medical equipment). May interpret medical laws, standards, and guidelines in the area (they can often vary by region and by medical practice). Medical lawyers typically assist victims in obtaining a damages award to compensate them for their losses and injuries.

  4. Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolam_v_Friern_Hospital...

    Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582 is an English tort law case that lays down the typical rule for assessing the appropriate standard of reasonable care in negligence cases involving skilled professionals such as doctors. This rule is known as the Bolam test, and states that if a doctor reaches the standard of a ...

  5. List of medical ethics cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_medical_ethics_cases

    Within 48 hours of being put on Paxil Schell killed his wife, daughter, infant granddaughter, and himself. Tim Tobin, Schell's son-in-law, took legal action against SmithKline (now GlaxoSmithKline). The Tobin case was heard in Wyoming from May 21 to June 6, 2001. The jury returned a guilty verdict against SmithKline and awarded Tobin $6.4 million.

  6. Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sorrell_v._IMS_Health_Inc.

    Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc., 564 U.S. 552 (2011), [1] is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a Vermont statute that restricted the sale, disclosure, and use of records that revealed the prescribing practices of individual doctors violated the First Amendment.

  7. Wilk v. American Medical Association - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilk_v._American_Medical...

    Until 1983, the AMA held that it was unethical for medical doctors to associate with an "unscientific practitioner", and labeled chiropractic "an unscientific cult". [ 2 ] Before 1980, Principle 3 of the AMA Principles of medical ethics stated: "A physician should practice a method of healing founded on a scientific basis; and he should not ...

  8. Medical malpractice in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_malpractice_in_the...

    Another study notes that about 1.14 million patient-safety incidents occurred among the 37 million hospitalizations in the Medicare population over the years 2000–2002. Hospital costs associated with such medical errors were estimated at $324 million in October 2008 alone. [6] Approximately 17,000 malpractice cases are filed in the U.S. each ...

  9. Bolitho v City and Hackney HA - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolitho_v_City_and_Hackney_HA

    Bolitho v. City and Hackney Health Authority [1996] 4 All ER 771 is an important English tort law case, on the standard of care required by medical specialists. It follows the Bolam test for professional negligence, and addresses the interaction with the concept of causation.