Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The relativistic mass is the sum total quantity of energy in a body or system (divided by c 2).Thus, the mass in the formula = is the relativistic mass. For a particle of non-zero rest mass m moving at a speed relative to the observer, one finds =.
Static mass increase is a third effect noted by Einstein in the same paper. [6] The effect is an increase in inertia of a body when other masses are placed nearby. While not strictly a frame dragging effect (the term frame dragging is not used by Einstein), it is demonstrated by Einstein that it derives from the same equation of general relativity.
The following notations are used very often in special relativity: Lorentz factor = where = and v is the relative velocity between two inertial frames.. For two frames at rest, γ = 1, and increases with relative velocity between the two inertial frames.
Three data points of Rogers et al., in agreement with special relativity. In 1940, Rogers et al. performed the first electron deflection test sufficiently precise to definitely rule out competing models. As in the Bucherer-Neumann experiments, the velocity and the charge-mass-ratio of beta particles of velocities up to 0.75c was measured.
Consequently, in some old texts, γ(v) 3 m 0 is referred to as the longitudinal mass, and γ(v)m 0 is referred to as the transverse mass, which is numerically the same as the relativistic mass. See mass in special relativity. If one inverts this to calculate acceleration from force, one gets
Accelerations in special relativity (SR) follow, as in Newtonian Mechanics, by differentiation of velocity with respect to time. Because of the Lorentz transformation and time dilation , the concepts of time and distance become more complex, which also leads to more complex definitions of "acceleration".
Vladimir Karapetoff (1944) "The special theory of relativity in hyperbolic functions", Reviews of Modern Physics 16:33–52, Abstract & link to pdf Lanczos, Cornelius (1949), The Variational Principles of Mechanics , University of Toronto Press , pp. 304– 312 Also used biquaternions.
The paradox was first formulated by James M. Supplee (1989), [1] where a non-rigorous explanation was presented. George Matsas [2] has analysed this paradox in the scope of general relativity and also pointed out that these relativistic buoyancy effects could be important in some questions regarding the thermodynamics of black holes. A ...