enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Long-delayed Minnesota copper-nickel mining project wins a ...

    www.aol.com/news/long-delayed-minnesota-copper...

    The Minnesota Court of Appeals on Monday affirmed a decision by a state agency to grant a major permit for the proposed NewRange copper-nickel mine, saying regulators adequately considered the ...

  3. United States v. Reserve Mining Company - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Reserve...

    Silver Bay's taconite ponds, 2010. United States of America v. Reserve Mining Company, 408 F. Supp. 1212 (D. Minn. 1976), was a United States District Court for the District of Minnesota case that determined the Reserve Mining Company was responsible for amphibole asbestos fibers found in the public drinking water of Duluth, Minnesota and other North Shore (Minnesota) communities.

  4. Mineral rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mineral_rights

    The right to receive delay rentals [11] The right to receive royalties; The owner of a mineral interest may separately convey any or all of the above-listed interests. Minerals may be possessed as a life estate, which does not permit a person to sell them, but merely that they own the minerals so long as they live. After this, the rights revert ...

  5. General Mining Act of 1872 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Mining_Act_of_1872

    The mining law of 1866 had given discoverers rights to stake mining claims to extract gold, silver, cinnabar (the principal ore of mercury) and copper. When Congress passed the General Mining Act of 1872, the wording was changed to "or other valuable deposits," giving greater scope to the law. The 1872 law was codified as 30 U.S.C. §§ 22-42 [14]

  6. Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caperton_v._A.T._Massey...

    Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., 556 U.S. 868 (2009), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires judges to recuse themselves not only when actual bias has been demonstrated or when the judge has an economic interest in the outcome of the case but also when "extreme facts" create a "probability of bias."

  7. Fresno is right to question county’s approval of mining ...

    www.aol.com/fresno-county-approval-mining...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  8. National Strategic and Critical Minerals Production Act

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Strategic_and...

    The organization argues that (1) most mining is being done by foreign companies, who will not be paying appropriate royalties to the federal government under the new law; (2) that an old mining law – the General Mining Act of 1872 – should be rewritten instead; and (3) that the National Strategic and Critical Minerals Production Act of 2013 ...

  9. Prior-appropriation water rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior-appropriation_water...

    The first one to discover and begin mining a deposit was acknowledged to have a legal right to mine. Because appropriation theory in mineral lands and water rights developed in the same time and place, it is likely that they influenced one another. [32] As with water rights, mining rights could be forfeited by nonuse.