enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Vistaprint - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vistaprint

   Website. https://www.vistaprint.com. Vistaprint is a global e-commerce company that produces physical and digital marketing products for small businesses. Vistaprint was one of the first businesses to offer its customers the capabilities of desktop publishing through the internet when it was launched in 1999.

3. Business card - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_card

   A Oscar Friedheim card cutting and scoring machine from 1889, capable of producing up to 100,000 visiting and business cards a day. Business cards are cards bearing business information about a company or individual. [1] [2] They are shared during formal introductions as a convenience and a memory aid.

4. Fluorescence microscope - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluorescence_microscope

   A fluorescence microscope is an optical microscope that uses fluorescence instead of, or in addition to, scattering, reflection, and attenuation or absorption, to study the properties of organic or inorganic substances. [1] [2] "Fluorescence microscope" refers to any microscope that uses fluorescence to generate an image, whether it is a simple ...

5. Vistaprint offers 250 free business cards - AOL

   www.aol.com/2010/07/22/vistaprint-offers-250...

   Vistaprint has another offer for 250 free business cards when you pay $5.67 for shipping. That ends up costing 2-cents a card. You can choose from 45 designs and enter your own text. Expires ...

6. Credit card imprinter - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credit_card_imprinter

   Credit card imprinter. A credit card imprinter, colloquially known as a ZipZap machine, click-clack machine or Knuckle Buster, is a manual device that was used by merchants to record credit card transactions before the advent of payment terminals. [1]

7. Music labels sue AI companies Suno, Udio for US copyright ...

   www.aol.com/news/music-labels-sue-ai-companies...

   The labels asked the courts to award statutory damages of up to $150,000 per song the defendants allegedly copied. They accused Suno of copying 662 songs and Udio of copying 1,670.