enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._Sullivan

    New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision ruling that the freedom of speech protections in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution restrict the ability of public officials to sue for defamation.

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Warren Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Yates v. United States: Free Speech: 354 U.S. 298 (1957) free speech, distinction between expression of opinion and advocacy of action Morey v. Doud: 354 U.S. 457 (1957) States do not have power to make special exemptions in legislation for particular actors (overruled by City of New Orleans v. Dukes) Roth v. United States: Free Speech: 354 U.S ...

  4. Actual malice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actual_malice

    This term was adopted by the Supreme Court in its landmark 1964 ruling in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, [2] in which the Warren Court held that: . The constitutional guarantees require, we think, a Federal rule that prohibits a public official from recovering damages for a defamatory falsehood relating to his official conduct unless he proves that the statement was made with 'actual malice ...

  5. Rod Nachman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rod_Nachman

    Merton Roland "Rod" Nachman Jr (1923-2015) was the lawyer for the plaintiff in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan. [1] [2] He is best known for that case, which he lost, although he had actually appeared before the Supreme Court of the United States a decade earlier (in 1951 when he was just 27) where he won.

  6. False statements of fact - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_statements_of_fact

    The legal rule itself – how to apply this exception – is complicated, as it is often dependent on who said the statement and which actor it was directed towards. [6] The analysis is thus different if the government or a public figure is the target of the false statement (where the speech may get more protection) than a private individual who is being attacked over a matter of their private ...

  7. New york times v. sullivan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/?title=New_york_times_v...

    What links here; Related changes; Upload file; Special pages; Permanent link; Page information; Cite this page; Get shortened URL; Download QR code

  8. History of The New York Times (1945–1998) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_The_New_York...

    This article is part of a series about The New York Times History 1851–1896 1896–1945 1945–1998 1998–present Online platforms Publications The New York Times The Upshot Other publications The New York Times International Edition International Herald Tribune The New York Times Magazine The New York Times Book Review Play T People Executives and board members A. G. Sulzberger Meredith ...

  9. Fair comment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_comment

    The defense of "fair comment" in the U.S. since 1964 has largely been replaced by the ruling in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964). This case relied on the issue of actual malice , which involves the defendant making a statement known at the time to be false, or which was made with a "reckless disregard" of whether the ...