Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Ad personam and ad hominem are distinct. The former is a personal attack, unrelated to the subject matter of the debate, which aims to discredit the person of the opponent regardless of his arguments; the latter focuses on the argumentation, reasoning or behavior of the opponent in relation to the subject matter of the debate, rather than directly on the subject matter of the debate itself.
Argumentum ad personam. Add languages. Add links. ... Upload file; Special pages ... Get shortened URL; Download QR code; Print/export Download as PDF; Printable ...
Often said of or used by politicians. Likewise, an argumentum ad captandum is an argument designed to please the crowd. ad clerum: to the clergy: Formal letter or communication in the Christian tradition from a bishop to his clergy. An ad clerum may be an encouragement in a time of celebration or a technical explanation of new regulations or ...
Ad personam; Argumentum a fortiori; Argumentum ad antiquitatem; Argumentum ad baculum; Argumentum ad captandum; Argumentum ad consequentiam; Argumentum ad crumenam; Argumentum ad ignorantiam; Argumentum ad lapidem; Argumentum ad lazarum; Argumentum ad logicam; Argumentum ad misericordiam; Argumentum ad novitatem; Argumentum ad populum ...
A solis ortu usque ad occasum; Ab urbe condita; Acta Apostolicae Sedis; Acta Croatica; Acta Diurna; Acta Senatus; Ad astra; Ad beatissimi Apostolorum; Ad eundem; Ad fontes; Ad hoc; Ad hominem; Ad honorem; Ad infinitum; Ad libitum; Ad maiorem Dei gloriam; Ad metalla; Ad nauseam; Ad orientem; Ad personam; Ad quod damnum; Ad sectam; Ad utrumque ...
Ad hominem (Latin for 'to the person'), short for argumentum ad hominem, refers to several types of arguments that are usually fallacious.Often currently this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than the substance of the argument itself.
united states district court for the district of columbia _____ public employees for environmental ) responsibility, et al., )
The Art of Being Right: 38 Ways to Win an Argument (also The Art of Controversy, or Eristic Dialectic: The Art of Winning an Argument; German: Eristische Dialektik: Die Kunst, Recht zu behalten; 1831) is an acidulous, sarcastic treatise written by the German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer. [1]