Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
For example, the study of code switching directly relates to pragmatics, since a switch in code effects a shift in pragmatic force. [ 23 ] According to Charles W. Morris , pragmatics tries to understand the relationship between signs and their users, while semantics tends to focus on the actual objects or ideas to which a word refers, and ...
That is, their meaning comes from their temporal contiguity with their referent: themselves. Example: "This is an example sentence." The anthropologist Aomar Boum uses a related concept of "ethnometapragmatics" to explain the Moroccan concept of showing the "plastic eye" ( 'ayn mika ), which refers to the practice of ignoring something while ...
Jef Verschueren is a Belgian linguist, academic, and author.He is an emeritus professor of Linguistics at the University of Antwerp. [1]Verschueren is most known for his work on semantics, pragmatics, sociolinguistics, and discourse analysis.
Pragmatism is a philosophical tradition that views language and thought as tools for prediction, problem solving, and action, rather than describing, representing, or mirroring reality.
In pragmatics, scalar implicature, or quantity implicature, [1] is an implicature that attributes an implicit meaning beyond the explicit or literal meaning of an utterance, and which suggests that the utterer had a reason for not using a more informative or stronger term on the same scale. The choice of the weaker characterization suggests ...
An example of pragmatically derived information that has traditionally been seen as an implicature, but must be an explicature according to Carston's reasoning, has already been mentioned above: "He drank a bottle of vodka and fell into a stupor" → "He drank a bottle of vodka and consequently fell into a stupor". [50]
Universal pragmatics (UP), more recently [when?] placed under the heading of formal pragmatics, is the philosophical study of the necessary conditions for reaching an understanding through communication.
[pragmatic + ism.] A special and limited form of pragmatism, in which the pragmatism is restricted to the determining of the meaning of concepts (particularly of philosophic concepts) by consideration of the experimental differences in the conduct of life which would conceivably result from the affirmation or denial of the meaning in question.