Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Rumsfeld v. Padilla , 542 U.S. 426 (2004), was a United States Supreme Court case, in which José Padilla , an American citizen, sought habeas corpus relief against Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld , as a result of his detention by the military as an " unlawful combatant ."
The Supreme Court heard the case, Rumsfeld v. Padilla, in April 2004, but on June 28, 2004, the court dismissed the petition on technical grounds because It was improperly filed in federal court in New York instead of South Carolina, where Padilla was being detained.
Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc., 547 U.S. 47 (2006), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the federal government, under the Solomon Amendment, could constitutionally withhold funding from universities if they refuse to give military recruiters access to school resources.
This is a list of Supreme Court of the United States cases in the areas of military justice, ... Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426 (2004) Rasul v. Bush, 542 U.S. 466 ...
Rumsfeld v. Padilla; W. Winkler v. Rumsfeld This page was last edited on 17 August 2021, at 07:51 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution ...
Donald Rumsfield, former Secretary of Defense from 1975 to 1977, and again from 2001 to 2006 amid the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, died Wednesday, according to a statement from his ...
The Supreme Court heard the case, Rumsfeld v. Padilla, in April 2004, but on 28 June it was thrown out on a technicality. The court declared that New York State, where the case was originally filed, was an improper venue and that the case should have been filed in South Carolina, where Padilla was being held.
Case name Opinion Decided Summary Lefemine v. Wideman: 12-168: 2012-11-05 Under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, a plaintiff who obtained only a permanent injunction against government officials (but no money damages) was a "prevailing party," so the government must pay his attorney fees. United States v. Bormes: 11-192: 2012-11-13