enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ledbetter_v._Goodyear_Tire...

    Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 550 U.S. 618 (2007), is an employment discrimination decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. [1] The result was that employers could not be sued under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 over race or gender pay discrimination if the claims were based on decisions made by the employer 180 days or more before the claim.

  3. Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilly_Ledbetter_Fair_Pay...

    Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009; Long title: An Act to amend title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, and to modify the operation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, to clarify that a discriminatory compensation decision or other practice that is unlawful under such Acts occurs each time ...

  4. Federal workers told offer to get paid through September if ...

    www.aol.com/news/federal-workers-told-offer-paid...

    The White House's Office of Personnel Management had told government workers in an email Tuesday that if they quit by Feb. 6, they would still get paid through Sept. 30.

  5. Communications Workers of America v. Beck - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Workers_of...

    Communications Workers of America v. Beck, 487 U.S. 735 (1988), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that, in a union security agreement, unions are authorized by statute to collect from non-members only those fees and dues necessary to perform its duties as a collective bargaining representative. [1]

  6. Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garcia_v._San_Antonio...

    Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority, 469 U.S. 528 (1985), is a landmark United States Supreme Court [1] decision in which the Court held that the Congress has the power under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution to extend the Fair Labor Standards Act, which requires that employers provide minimum wage and overtime pay to their employees, to state and local governments. [2]

  7. Janus v. AFSCME - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janus_v._AFSCME

    Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, No. 16-1466, 585 U.S. ___ (2018), abbreviated Janus v.AFSCME, is a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on US labor law, concerning the power of labor unions to collect fees from non-union members.

  8. Highly paid oil rig worker merits overtime, U.S. Supreme ...

    www.aol.com/news/highly-paid-oil-rig-worker...

    An oil rig supervisor who earned more than $200,000 a year working for Houston-based Helix Energy Solutions Group Inc is entitled to overtime pay, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday in a ...

  9. Kloeckner v. Solis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kloeckner_v._Solis

    The Federal Government then successfully had the venue changed to the federal district court in St. Louis then immediately filed for a dismissal due to lack of jurisdiction. The Civil Service Reform Act directs that cases relating to employee termination are to be heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit but cases ...