enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Lange v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lange_v._California

    Lange v. California, 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the exigent circumstances requirement related to the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court ruled unanimously that the warrantless entry into a home by police in pursuit of a misdemeanant is not unequivocally justified.

  3. Chapman v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chapman_v._California

    California, 386 U.S. 18 (1967), [1] was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that a federal "harmless error" rule must apply, instead of equivalent state rules, for reviewing trials where federally-protected rights had been violated.

  4. Hurtado v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurtado_v._California

    Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516 (1884), [1] was a landmark case [2] [3] decided by the United States Supreme Court that allowed state governments, as distinguished from the federal government, to avoid using grand juries in criminal prosecutions.

  5. The Supreme Court rules against California woman whose ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-rules-against...

    The Supreme Court on Friday ruled against a California woman who said her rights were violated after federal officials refused to allow her husband into the country, in part, because of the way ...

  6. Robinson v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robinson_v._California

    Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962), is the first landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court in which the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution was interpreted to prohibit criminalization of particular acts or conduct, as contrasted with prohibiting the use of a particular form of punishment for a crime.

  7. Smith v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_v._California

    Smith v. California, 361 U.S. 147 (1959), was a U.S. Supreme Court case upholding the freedom of the press.The decision deemed unconstitutional a city ordinance that made one in possession of obscene books criminally liable because it did not require proof that one had knowledge of the book's content, and thus violated the freedom of the press guaranteed in the First Amendment. [1]

  8. Measure to restrict tax increases cannot appear on November ...

    www.aol.com/news/measure-restrict-tax-increases...

    "The state Supreme Court has now sent a signal that they are part of the progressive agenda in California, that we are a one-party state in California and there is no independent judiciary ...

  9. Public employees cannot use labor law to sue employers ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/controversial-labor-law-doesnt...

    The California Supreme Court ruling curtails the ability of public employees in the state to seek help from the courts in labor disputes. Public employees cannot use labor law to sue employers ...